This is why we suggest you to get some writing assistance from our awesome thesis writers. Our experts have been writing dissertations for years. Bottom line, we have extensive experience writing dissertations that any professor or any supervisor can appreciate. If you are a graduate or undergraduate student, getting assistance from us is very simple. Get in touch with us and send us a detailed list of requirements. Give our professionals as much information about your project as you can. Also, you could send us some materials if you thing they will help our expert do a better job.

We will pair you with our most experienced writers or you can choose the writers you like. Once you make payment for the paper, our experts start working. Your dissertation will be ready before the deadline, guaranteed. And remember, it will be perfect. All the information will be sourced from authoritative sources and properly cited and referenced. We will handle the research part ourselves as well. Getting the best dissertation help has never been easier. Let our writers all of them have at least one PhD degree work their magic and help you get a top grade on your dissertation. So, can you do my dissertation right away? Sure, just get in touch with us today!

Your email address will not be published. As Putin continues killing civilians, bombing kindergartens, and threatening WWIII, Ukraine fights for the world's peaceful future. Skip to content How hard is it to write a dissertation? Mandatory Parts of a Dissertation Still in college, many students are starting to research ways to get their PhD. Here is what you will need to include in your paper: The dissertation Abstract. This is basically a very short summary of your entire dissertation. A scholar will read it to find out if your paper can help him with his work or if your paper is going to be of interest.

The dissertation Introduction. The introduction is around two pages long and its main goal is to give your reader an idea of what you will be discussing in your paper. You can also briefly describe the methods you will be using and even present a bit of information about your findings and conclusions. The Dissertation Methods and Discussion. This part is different from dissertation to dissertation. You will need to provide extensive information about the methods you have used to gather the data and the results of your research. Also, you will need to carefully discuss each result and critically analyze it. You can use an empirical or non-empirical route in this section. The Dissertation Conclusions.

The conclusion should be viewed as the deduction part of your paper. Think long and hard about what you can deduce from your findings. Make assumptions and suppositions. This section is very important because it shows the committee that you have understood the subject and managed to answer the research questions. The Dissertation References. The references section is the part where you include all the materials you have used to write the paper. Any journals, articles, interviews, etc. Also, every time you cite anything in your text, you should create a reference entry. Length and Quality of Content What happens if you fail college? Here are a few hints to get you started: The length of a dissertation can vary from to pages in length.

The content needs to contain original research and a critical analysis of the findings. Referencing a dissertation is not that difficult, regardless of the academic format APA, MLA, Chicago, etc. What Can Go Wrong? Here are some of the reasons why you can fail your dissertation: You focus on your grades in grad school. Remember that nobody cares about your grades in grad school. Instead of working on your dissertation every chance you get, you are more worried about low grades. You procrastinate. People will always ask about your dissertation and if you cannot give them a clear answer as to what you are doing, you have probably chosen the wrong dissertation topic!

They will be able to talk it over with you and steer you in the right direction. Data Difficulties The data collection stage of your dissertation can pose a number of different problems. When you begin researching your method of data collection, you may realise that the sample size will not be big enough for your study, that it will be too hard to collect your primary data, or that the results will be insufficient or irrelevant to your area of study. This will require you to reconsider your topic; perhaps you need to adjust it slightly to fit an easier method of data collection.

The wrong dissertation topic can ruin your degree! Tip: Plan and research your data collection well in advance. Ask yourself key questions, such as: will the data collected will be sufficient? Will you be able to collect it with no great difficulty? Will it support your dissertation? Once you are certain that you will have plenty of useful data for your topic, you are well on your way! Reluctant Supervisor For the duration of your dissertation, your supervisor will likely be your most trusted advisor, there to assist with all aspects of your work; from the early planning stages, right through to guiding you in the dissertation writing process.

After all, your supervisor will be an expert in the field of your dissertation and will immediately know whether a dissertation is going to succeed or not. Tip: In the first meeting you arrange with your supervisor, make sure that you clearly outline your ideas for your topic and are ready to take on board any criticism or suggestions. Do not stick with the wrong dissertation topic! The research represented a breakthrough in cancer research. In this case, the graduate dean signed the three-page dissertation himself as a committee of one, and the three faculty members were fired. This bad behavior is entrapment. They deliberately delay giving back a draft in a timely manner until the student is obliged to register for another semester. This behavior is particularly prevalent in online universities, many of whom are more interested in money than they are in granting degrees to students.

I know of seven students from four different online institutions who will never graduate because, after three or more years of working on their dissertations, they have run out of money for additional semester hours. They riddle draft after draft with hundreds of corrections again and again. These advisors frequently correct their own corrections. These advisors want the thesis or dissertation to sound like they wrote it themselves, and will endlessly correct language in the belief that they are making necessary changes. If the student knew what the advisor wanted, it would have been done right the first time.

They demand that the student copy the exact format of the last several theses or dissertations the advisor chaired, whether it suits the content or not. This behavior has one of two possible causes. Either the advisor is arrogant and egotistical and thinks his format is perfect, or the advisor is afraid to depart from a format with which he or she is familiar. In fact, I read a dissertation that had only 5 pages of text—and 50 pages of pictures of the wings of dragonflies. The dissertation represented four years of research. I passed it. Such students often quit because they run out of money or time. A student I recently counseled had been allowed to propose collecting data by conducting personal interviews with over 1, elementary school teachers, one at a time.

She would never have completed this task before her tenure in graduate school was terminated, yet her proposal was accepted. They do not have the courage to tell the student that they should drop out of graduate school because they are not doing graduate-level work. When I was the graduate school editor I read an appalling dissertation from a very nice student. She had an advisor and three committee members. Her committee member was right. The dissertation looked like the work of a seventh-grade student. I wondered how she had gotten so far in higher education, and why she had not been stopped sooner by her advisor or the other committee members. Apparently, only one committee member had the courage to refuse her dissertation.

She sued the university, but she did not get her doctoral degree. There are other bad behaviors not listed here. The sign that a student has a bad advisor is when deadlines are missed, forward progress is attenuated, and no end is in sight. Becoming a victim of the Stockholm syndrome should not be the only way to get a degree. Count the cost of a bad advisor. They may have lived in undesirable places. They may have lost wages because they were geographically tied to the degree-granting university and unable to seek the best paying job elsewhere. They have lost years of life when they could have been doing something more enjoyable and less costly in time and money, which is why graduate students may become doormats for bad advisors.

They are afraid their entire investment will be lost if they protest their treatment. If your advisor has any one of the nine above-described characteristics, or others that are impeding your forward progress, you need to seek help. It only takes one bad behavior on the part of an advisor to make your graduate experience a nightmare. This Website and several others in the same network specialize in assisting students from the time they choose a research topic to the end of the oral defense. The key to surviving a bad advisor, or later, a bad boss, is to develop the skills to manage upward. Manage the manager. Graduate school is professional school, and students should act like the professionals they hope to be from the first day they set foot in the department.

That means dressing well, keeping an appropriate social distance from members of the faculty, and keeping the majority of their personal lives to themselves. Students should choose an advisor as carefully as choosing a partner in life. The student should interview graduate students a year or two ahead in the program, or better, some who have graduated who had the same prospective advisor. Those who are still in the department may not want to say anything negative about their advisor because their own degrees might be threatened if negative remarks got back to their advisor. Some departments assign an advisor in an effort to level the work load, and the student has no choice. The bad advisors get the same number of students as everyone else, and they can hide in the numbers.

Last Updated on August 6, by Ayla Myrick. There are bad thesis and dissertation advisors in every institution of higher education in every part of the world. Bad thesis and dissertations advisors cost students thousands of dollars, many months of unnecessary toil, and, in too many cases, the graduate degree they are seeking. Graduate students are abused by unscrupulous thesis or dissertation advisors, some of whom may be ignorant of their responsibilities toward the student, some who are deliberately abusive because graduate students represent an unwanted annoyance, or worse, advisors who enjoy the feeling of empowerment over another human being. A faculty member new to the department can make a bad advisor. He or she is probably on a tenure track, meaning their work will be scrutinized by other members of the department.

When I chose her and started my dissertation, she turned down the research topic I wanted to do and made me do her own. I am now doing my ninth revision of the proposal to do research, and she still keeps correcting practically every word I write. New faculty members may be more interested in making a good impression on their new colleagues than in moving a student through the process in an expeditious manner, and the result can be an endless round of corrections and additions to a thesis or dissertation as they try to turn out a perfect piece of work on their first try.

Also, they may never have managed a graduate student, and lack the skills to do so. Advisors do not take a class in how to be an advisor. Consequently, they tend to put students through the same process they went through themselves, and it may not have been a good model. The opposite is the advisor who acts like a king on a throne and forces the student to become a supplicant. He is supporting 10 graduate students, and is in demand as a speaker. It is an honor to be his student because he can really help you professionally. Advisors who have a string of publications on their records and several research projects may look good on paper, but they do not necessarily make good advisors because graduate students may be at the bottom of their priorities.

They have little time to spare, are almost never in their offices, every meeting is hurried, and their trips to conferences and meetings can keep a student from making deadlines. An advisor who fails to apprise a student of 1 the ground rules of the department or graduate school, or 2 the ground rules of their personal process for moving a student through research and writing a thesis or dissertation. The omission of information lays traps for students. This particular red flag is hard to detect before it is too late, so the student should study the thesis and dissertation process of both the university and the department as if it were another class. There are several books about the process available on Amazon.

The unspoken rules of the graduate process keep students blind from the beginning. First, the chain of command is never explained. When in graduate school the dean of the graduate school, not the dean of the college, is the dean presiding over the graduate student. This arrangement is one of the checks and balances in place to protect graduate students from abuse. The position of graduate dean is often a part-time appointment in addition to a regular faculty role. When I was a graduate school editor I had the lofty title of Research and Writing Coordinator, but I was just an editor. Because there was no assistant dean, I was usually the first person to hear about abuse of a student.

Only twice in twelve years was it too late to salvage the situation with the help of the dean. Second, a department must prove it is a viable asset to the university. In large part, departmental value to the university is based upon how many students they graduate per year. For instance, if a philosophy department only graduates one or two students a year, the department may be eliminated through programmatic reduction, including all faculty, tenured or not. The university adds up the cost of the space a department occupies, the overhead to maintain that space, the cost of journal subscriptions for the library ordered by the department that can cost a small fortune , classroom space, and all other costs of maintaining a degree-granting department.

If the department cannot justify the expense of maintaining the program, it is in danger of being eliminated. This is one reason departments write research grants. One would think advisors would be cognizant that the very existence of their department is on the line when they abuse students to the degree that they never graduate. Choosing an advisor should be easy after a student has taken a few classes from each member of the department, but it is not. A bad advisor has one or more of the following characteristics after they accept a student for advisement:. They treat graduate students like servants, asking them to sweep floors, stock shelves, run errands, and do other tasks more appropriately assigned to a secretary or a paid assistant, and may ask a student to help out in their personal life by grocery shopping, cleaning the pool, or taking a car in for service.

They take credit for student work, publishing papers under their own name, talking about discoveries in meetings as if they were their own, and may go so far as to flunk the student out and then publish on the research the student generated. The research represented a breakthrough in cancer research. In this case, the graduate dean signed the three-page dissertation himself as a committee of one, and the three faculty members were fired. This bad behavior is entrapment. They deliberately delay giving back a draft in a timely manner until the student is obliged to register for another semester.

This behavior is particularly prevalent in online universities, many of whom are more interested in money than they are in granting degrees to students. I know of seven students from four different online institutions who will never graduate because, after three or more years of working on their dissertations, they have run out of money for additional semester hours. They riddle draft after draft with hundreds of corrections again and again. These advisors frequently correct their own corrections. These advisors want the thesis or dissertation to sound like they wrote it themselves, and will endlessly correct language in the belief that they are making necessary changes. If the student knew what the advisor wanted, it would have been done right the first time. They demand that the student copy the exact format of the last several theses or dissertations the advisor chaired, whether it suits the content or not.

This behavior has one of two possible causes. Either the advisor is arrogant and egotistical and thinks his format is perfect, or the advisor is afraid to depart from a format with which he or she is familiar. In fact, I read a dissertation that had only 5 pages of text—and 50 pages of pictures of the wings of dragonflies. The dissertation represented four years of research. I passed it. Such students often quit because they run out of money or time. A student I recently counseled had been allowed to propose collecting data by conducting personal interviews with over 1, elementary school teachers, one at a time. She would never have completed this task before her tenure in graduate school was terminated, yet her proposal was accepted.

They do not have the courage to tell the student that they should drop out of graduate school because they are not doing graduate-level work. When I was the graduate school editor I read an appalling dissertation from a very nice student. She had an advisor and three committee members. Her committee member was right. The dissertation looked like the work of a seventh-grade student. I wondered how she had gotten so far in higher education, and why she had not been stopped sooner by her advisor or the other committee members. Apparently, only one committee member had the courage to refuse her dissertation. She sued the university, but she did not get her doctoral degree. There are other bad behaviors not listed here. The sign that a student has a bad advisor is when deadlines are missed, forward progress is attenuated, and no end is in sight.

Becoming a victim of the Stockholm syndrome should not be the only way to get a degree. Count the cost of a bad advisor. They may have lived in undesirable places. They may have lost wages because they were geographically tied to the degree-granting university and unable to seek the best paying job elsewhere. They have lost years of life when they could have been doing something more enjoyable and less costly in time and money, which is why graduate students may become doormats for bad advisors. They are afraid their entire investment will be lost if they protest their treatment. If your advisor has any one of the nine above-described characteristics, or others that are impeding your forward progress, you need to seek help.

It only takes one bad behavior on the part of an advisor to make your graduate experience a nightmare. This Website and several others in the same network specialize in assisting students from the time they choose a research topic to the end of the oral defense. The key to surviving a bad advisor, or later, a bad boss, is to develop the skills to manage upward. Manage the manager. Graduate school is professional school, and students should act like the professionals they hope to be from the first day they set foot in the department. That means dressing well, keeping an appropriate social distance from members of the faculty, and keeping the majority of their personal lives to themselves. Students should choose an advisor as carefully as choosing a partner in life.

The student should interview graduate students a year or two ahead in the program, or better, some who have graduated who had the same prospective advisor. Those who are still in the department may not want to say anything negative about their advisor because their own degrees might be threatened if negative remarks got back to their advisor. Some departments assign an advisor in an effort to level the work load, and the student has no choice. The bad advisors get the same number of students as everyone else, and they can hide in the numbers.

Before making a choice students should go to the library and find the last two or three theses or dissertations a prospective advisor has chaired and look at the format, the depth of the statistical analysis, the length of the review of literature, and the intensity of the detail. This should be done by every graduate student. Advisors tend to repeat themselves student after student. If a student has an advisor with any one of the bad behaviors listed previously, or another behavior that is delaying forward progress, that student should seek help immediately. The Website you are on is part of a network of Websites designed to help graduate students and others with their writing projects, whether they have a bad advisor or not.

Manage upward. Keep an advisor informed constantly. Send him or her e-mails on a regular basis, and keep it up the entire time the thesis or dissertation is in process. Advisors like to know students are working hard and should be impressed with your enthusiasm and dedication, real or not. When a deadline approaches, remind the advisor 4 weeks in advance, and again 2 weeks before the deadline occurs. Put a box somewhere at home and keep every scrap of paper pertaining to your graduate degree program. In particular, keep a CD copy or a hard copy of every corrected manuscript the advisor hands back.

This short article cannot encompass all the troubles that can occur between a graduate student and a bad advisor, nor can the writer anticipate what might be the best course of action in a given situation. Make the presentation as good as you can. Also, not thinking critically is definitely going to hurt your score. You need to be able to think critically and come up with original ideas that are supported by well-researched data. After you submit your thesis to the committee, you will need to defend it. If you have been polite and professional from the first day of work with your advisor, you have nothing to fear.

Categories:

• Online Essays
• Essay Experts
• Custom Essays
• Essay Online
• Essay Website